Minneapolis » By neighborhood:
St. Paul » By neighborhood:

Site navigation

By section

SMTWTFS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Xcel next in line to target Phillips

Electricity transmission tower, near Aust, England, UK. (Photo by Yummifruitbat, licensed under Creative Commons)

November 23, 2008

Xcel Energy plans to build two substations in South Minneapolis, connecting them with high power transmission lines. Xcel says the new substations are essential to meet increased demand for electricity in the community and to replace an outdated distribution system. Residents in the Phillips neighborhood and advocates for the Midway Greenway want more answers before Xcel gets a green light from regulators. Among their questions:
• Are there alternatives to “huge, ugly” towers?
• How would the substations impact Little Earth’s new home ownership initiative?
• If transmission lines run above the Greenway, how would that affect future transit development?
• Do EMF emissions pose health risks?
• Have all options for conservation and alternative energy been explored?

During Thanksgiving week, the Midtown Greenway Coalition will hold a meeting with Xcel engineers and representatives from the most impacted neighborhoods to learn more about the electricity needs that the Hiawatha Project will address. For more information, call the coalition office at 612-879-0103.


Xcel Energy has proposed to construct two substations, connected by one and a quarter miles of high power lines in South Minneapolis. Officially named the Hiawatha Project, it is the company’s response to increased population growth and economic development experienced by business and residential communities along major thoroughfares like Lake Street, home of the Midtown Global Market; Chicago Avenue, where Abbott Northwestern and Children’s Hospital reside; and Hiawatha Avenue, along the lightrail line. The project is expected to provide “necessary transmission and distribution capacity…reduce exposure to outage-causing hazards, and reduce service restoration time,” as explained in the company’s project summary.

The current distribution system, designed and installed more than fifty years ago, has been deemed insufficient to meet projected demand for the area. According to Xcel, “Without these improvements, South Minneapolis could begin experiencing service disruptions as soon as 2010.” The new system is expected to provide reliable electricity through the next 20 years.

The boundaries of the impact area for construction are Interstate 35W, East 31st Street, East 26th Street, and 26th Avenue South. That area includes parts of the following neighborhoods: Phillips West, Midtown Phillips, East Phillips, Seward, Longfellow, Corcoran, Powderhorn Park, and Central. Although construction would be concentrated in Phillips, the new substations would have the capacity to meet energy demands as far north as Interstate 94 to the north, south to Interstate 494, Highway 169 on the West and Hiawatha Avenue to the East.

The Phillips neighborhood has fought its share of infrastructure and development battles, most recently with Kandiyohi Development Partners’ proposal of a biomass plant in the area. Carol Pass, President of the East Phillips Improvement Coalition (EPIC) says she’s not necessarily opposed to the project, but she is cautious.

“We have to be vigilant with regard to the neighborhood,” says Pass. “I mean look at what we’ve been through…we’ve always had to stand alone while people from elsewhere with more resources come in with various projects for us.”

EPIC recently passed a motion outlining several demands from Xcel before an application is submitted to the Public Utilities Commission.

“We insist that there be a longer amount of time before making a final decision so we can research this further,” says Pass. “We’re absolutely against the consideration of 26th Street…explore the underground option…and someone should share the cost.”

“Residents are most concerned about visibility…the look of it,” said Xcel spokesperson Patti Nystuen. This brings up the question of overhead or underground equipment. The price of overhead power lines and substations would be approximately $2 million compared to an $18 million price tag for underground construction.

“These huge towers are ugly. They take away the appeal of the neighborhood,” said Pass. Xcel says they are considering some combination of both, but projects the final investment amount at $15 million.

The design of the Hiawatha Project proposes one substation near the Hiawatha corridor and the other in the Midtown corridor. But community members have problems with both locations. The Midtown Greenway seems to be a likely target for raising high power lines in a densely populated area.

Tim Springer, executive director of the Midtown Greenway Coalition says it may have a “negative impact on the potential for the Midtown Greenway to serve a spine for future transit oriented (and bikeway oriented) development.

“Some brainstorms shared so far include investment in some of the infrastructure needed for our hoped-for Midtown Greenway streetcar line that will run alongside the trails and the creation of a public walkway along portions of the street-level Greenway rim,” he explained.

From a different perspective, Pass is concerned about the potential use of East 26th Street. “Little Earth has just launched their home ownership initiative, which would expand their boundaries west to East 26th Street. They’re expanding in a very bad area, which they plan to restore…no, not 26th,” urged Pass.

Perhaps the biggest concern is the emission of electro-magnetic fields, which also adds to Pass’s concern for the project’s location. EMF exposure also brings concerns for a potential health risk.

“Research is inconclusive regarding whether living in magnetic fields causes childhood leukemia,” said Springer.

“If [the substations] are buried, the EMFs dissipate much faster, making [the new equipment] more effective, but then it may be harder to fix and harder to find bad spots,” said Pass.

Xcel Project Manager Betty Mirzayi argues that most people are exposed to EMFs right inside of their homes due to the increased use of electronics, computers, microwaves, and machines that use electricity. “We will monitor the output for safety according to the latest studies,” she said.

And who will pay for the project? Community members are concerned about having to foot the bill, especially if it doesn’t meet the desires of the community.

“I challenge someone at Xcel to take on the additional cost…don’t do this to the neighborhood…be a moral hero and make a financial sacrifice,” said Pass. Residents fear they may have to assume extra costs if the more desirable underground plan is implemented.

There is a popular notion in the community that Xcel Energy is trying to make a profit.

“They are essentially building a power sale site,” said community organizer and Seward resident Mark Sulander. “They need the new equipment to sell power.”

Xcel says that on the contrary the community will benefit through annual property tax revenues.

Sulander suggests there should be an adequate assessment of the existing equipment. “There is outdated equipment at Midtown and the hospital, but they should fix that first, and then find the need,” he said.

Finding the need is part of the state’s regulatory process. A certificate of need and a route permit are required by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) before a transmission line can be built. The certificate of need proceeding determines whether the project may be necessary as well as the suitable size, design and time frame for the project. Through the Routing Permit the MPUC determines the route and design of the line.

Xcel says there are also environmental benefits to their proposal: “Having a more efficient electric system with lower line losses will reduce the carbon footprint generated by electricity use in the city of Minneapolis.”

“We don’t know enough about this not to have some fears,” says Pass. “We do worry that we’re part of an energy highway that will make a profit. There seems to be a conflict of interest. The very people expressing a need are the very ones that will make a profit.”

What about alternatives to implementing this project? Community members have highlighted options like conservation or even the company’s power distribution efficiency program, Smart Grid.

Xcel says energy conservation is not enough. “Nearly half of all eligible residential customers in South Minneapolis are participating in our Saver’s Switch conservation program. However, [this] won’t sufficiently offset project demand or eliminate existing deficiencies,” according to the company’s printed materials.

Other alternatives suggested by community leaders include local power generation through solar heat and electricity as well as evaluating the demand curve for load shifting potential.

Mirzayi says Xcel welcomes participation and feedback from the community. “We are required to notify the impacted area of outreach efforts including activities and events. More open houses will be scheduled in December before the [MPUC] application is submitted,” she said.

Xcel plans to submit its permit application in January 2009. They project construction to begin in October 2009 pending regulatory review and approval, with a service start date by June 2010.

“We remain concerned,” said Springer. “It seems unlikely that this time-frame will allow for a full community understanding of the electricity needs to be met and to work with Xcel on alternative strategies prior to a permit application submission.” Others have heard that Xcel has been talking to the City of Minneapolis to speed up the permit process.

“If it is determined to the community’s satisfaction that the electricity needs of the area cannot be addressed through conservation and local distributed generation and the substations and transmission line must be built, then there are likely to be mitigation measures,” said Springer. “Until we learn more about the electricity needs that the project will address we don’t have an opinion about whether the project is justified based on local demands.”

“We just want to keep the lights on here,” said Patti Nystuen of Xcel Energy. “We’re doing it here because it would benefit the community. These are the people who need it.”

Lauretta Dawolo Towns is a freelancer for several local community and ethnic news outlets. She is also a mentor in the Big Brothers, Big Sisters program and a consultant with the Girls in Action program at Patrick Henry High School. Towns is a resident of the McKinley neighborhood in North Minneapolis where she lives with her husband and newborn son.

Comments

Gjerry Berquist's picture

Who pays, who profits?

Did I miss something in this article about who is going to get stuck for the cost of the Excel’s infrastucture improvement? Will the ratepayers in Phillips get the double whamey of higher rates and a very ugly skyline? Community meetings during December? Is this an intentional ploy by Excel to reduce the number of attendees? The power companies in France bury practically all of their power lines close to communities. It is doable and affordable. We should accept nothing else. They wouldn’t hang lines off of high towers in Edina, why should they think they can do it in Phillips?

Ann's picture

1st the arsenic, now cancer from radiation

The poor don’t matter.
They built these towers near a school and the kids climbed the towers and played under the wires.. Of course they weren’t suppose to climb the towers but they were just too inticing.

I’m from Fresno Ca, and some of my friends went to Slater Elementary school. The kids at Slater Elementary School in Fresno, CA had the highest rate of cancer in all of the Central Valley.
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/mindnet/mn15b.htm
http://cirrus.unbc.ca/nres/705/intro/lec1/currents_skeptic.txt

http://www2.co.fresno.ca.us/0110a/Questys_Agenda/MG152364/AS152365/AS152...

Carol Overland's picture

No Line!

But fyi, it doesn’t require a Certificate of Need, it’s too short! Wall Street Journal reports that Xcel CEO Dick Kelly admits that there was a 3% DECREASE in use in their territory, other utilities report the same and HIGHER! It’s not needed. Also, as I understand it, the “need” is a power quality issue — so upgrade the distribution system first, that should solve the problem.

Carol Ann Pass's picture

Xcel Energy Holds Public Meetings for New Substations and Power

Corrections/Responses to the tcdailyplanet article.

First, the main concerns of Phillips residents with Xcel’s Hiawatha Project involve health risks, not aesthetics, as stated by Xcel spokesperson Patti Nystuen. While there isn’t as obvious and glaring a health risk, as the 37% in asthma-producing particles in the case of the Midtown Incinerator, no study simply absolves Electro-Magnetic Fields of any health risks. So even if it can be argued that “Research is inconclusive regarding whether living in magnetic fields causes childhood leukemia,” ( Tim Springer), it should remain a serious concern, because many studies indicate that there is still an apparent indication of a slight rise in childhood leukemia and this may suggest other concerns. This indication coupled with the increased health challenges of Phillips’ kids in general means that it is an ethical obligation to take all of these increased challenges to these children much more seriously than might be the case in other neighborhoods with fewer issues. All those who propose projects in Phillips, especially Xcel Energy in the present case, need to understand that.

It is not the case that those of us who are politically and environmentally motivated to protect the Phillips community are the rogue citizens and wild-eyed radicals suggested by some in our recent bout with the Midtown EcoEnergy project. It is rather that we are faced with dramatically challenged families, already threatened by deep poverty, already-existing pollution, a lack of family education, minority status, limited English and other issues. We simply believe that it is unjust to pile on more challenges and have been willing to take this seriously. I am willing to believe that many who have been critical of our behavior would join us if they really lived here and had a greater understanding and affinity with the people here.

Second, I believe I said that “people from elsewhere with more resources come in with various projects”… not “for us” as stated in the article, unless I was being ironic, but done TO us FOR people elsewhere. If I did not state this directly in that quote, I stated this clearly elsewhere. Basically, from the garbage transfer station to an over-large apartment building to the Midtown Burner and now to the Xcel Project, these things benefit people who primarily reside elsewhere in more affluent areas, only some of whom may work here. It is true that the Hospitals and Midtown Exchange employ Phillips people, and we appreciate that, however, I think it can be shown that the profits, almost entirely, go elsewhere. This was the case in all these previous projects. We think that a cost/benefit analysis would demonstrate that Phillips’ people bear whatever cost there is for the benefit of those less challenged elsewhere.

Third, because of that, I suggested that Xcel Energy (also possibly some of the larger businesses) assume some of the actual cost of burying the lines if it is shown that they must be here. They and their investors are the ones who will primarily gain financially by doing business here. Though I realize that we all need power, most of the residents can manage with what we currently have. I do not think asking Xcel to shoulder a significant portion of the cost of burying the lines is an unreasonable request and it appears to many in Phillips to be a just solution. Perhaps if rates must go up, and the rest of the city will benefit from our hosting this troublesome project, then Xcel and the city should give Phillips residents a rate cut or simply assume a large share of the cost of burying the lines, thus protecting the health of the Phillips residents and assisting in maintaining property values, aesthetics and future prosperity of the area.

Fourth, though “Xcel Project Manager Betty Mirzayi argues that most people are exposed to EMFs right inside of their homes due to the increased use of electronics, computers, microwaves, and machines that use electricity”, again, it is the increased challenges that already exist here in Phillips that make these arguments worrisome. We already appear to have increased cancers, increased depression, increased childhood diseases, a higher mortality rate on almost every scale, etc. Ms. Mirzavi’s words might allay fears if all other things were equal, but they are not. We may be adding burdens to already struggling people and there is no clear proof that we are not. The old Hippocratic Oath for doctors, “Do no harm”, should be a maxim for everyone as much as possible.

For this reason, East Phillips Improvement Coalition, EPIC, does oppose running the power lines down 26th Street, even if buried. This is the site of the new Little Earth Home Ownership project, which will run right along 26th St. for two blocks. This community deserves historically to not have that additional concern.

However, contrary to implications in the Mpls. Star, East Phillips Improvement Coalition, EPIC, has not absolutely opposed the Hiawatha Project, but these words encapsulate where most Phillips residents are coming from in response to the project, and we call on any who have influence regarding it to understand and appreciate this.

Carol Ann Pass,
President, East Phillips Improvement Coalition, EPIC

Carol Overland's picture

Where's the electrical study?

There’s supposed to be a Mpls. electrical study, update of “state of the system” in the area, that this project’s need claim is based on… but wait… where’s the study? Can’t have the cart in front of the wrong end of the horse here, let’s see what the study says about need, and let’s see current and 5 years worth of demand figures for surrounding substations. Let’s also see the SAIDI, SAIFI and CAIDI reports that Xcel has to file with the PUC — where, what, why and when are the outages, what’s the frequency and duration? What’s really going on? Without that, who’s to say a line is needed? Here’re they’re working on perking up the area, and Xcel wants to put in transmission lines? Where? Where is the open space? Maybe “stealth” structures that look like saguaro cacti? Naaaaaaah, if there ever was a case, this is it — underground at Xcel’s expense.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

BOOKS | "Skirmish": Bitterly funny poetry from Dobby Gibson

To be honest, I’ve never been an avid reader of poetry. I have nothing against poems, but for some reason my mind wants words on a page to present themselves as prose, and balks at taking them seriously when they’re organized in rhymed couplets, sonnet form, or—God forbid—free verse. When verse is set to music, I can generally handle it better. One reason I found Minneapolis poet Dobby Gibson’s new collection, Skirmish, so enjoyable is that his combination of mordant wit and bittersweet longing so recalls the lyrics of my favorite songwriter, Bob Dylan. MORE »

News you can use

Taking it to the streets -- or the meeting rooms

Two opportunities to speak out on budgets, local and state:

MORE »